Linder Daily Commentary, 2017-04-27

27 April 2017

Notes: Ancient animal bones suggest humans in Americas 130,000 years ago. No human bones found, but it appears hungry hominids of some sort were grinding on mastadon bones. Coulter gives up speech at Berkeley, citing security concerns. The left succeeds again in using physical pressure to no-platform normals. (((Milo))) plans a Free Speech Week, sometime this fall, will last a month if admin doesn't get in line. Jew Ezra Levant is flying his team of rump rangers (fake Rebel Media) in to grab whatever spotlight is left. Trump unveils plans for largest tax cut ever and review of national monuments (he correctly calls massive federal land grabs). Is there any order the president can issue a judge can't block? Stay tuned. Yeager on Trump's obscene, disgraceful and factually wrong lies supporting YamHaShoa, which means HorsHaShit in English.

How Jews Destroy White Nations
Jews work all, and I mean ALL, angles simultaneously. To grasp what they're doing, don't think about jews. Think about how you would go about destroying a white nation. Then compare that with what's actually going on. See? Real easy. You'd promote everything that destroyed communities, families and individuals. You'd force-mix violent retards ('black mans') into white neighborhoods, you'd encourage white girls to see niggers as mates. You'd encourage homosexuality among white boys. You'd define the white character as Authoritarian (Nazi). You'd defame with fake history any force that dared stand up for whites against the jews. You'd promote anti-male sentiment among women. You'd teach them that their own fathers and grandfathers oppressed them, rather than created them and gave them everything they ever had. You'd encourage their higher-IQ women to have careers, thereby limiting their families to few children, and reducing average white IQ. You'd get the dumber ones hooked on drugs and alcohol and gambling, creating addicts and wrecking their lives and families. You'd get them hooked on credit cards with high interest, and sell their proles on middle-age "college" lol that would sink them in the debt of easy federal student loans. You'd open the borders, and bring in barbarian terrorists. Anyone who resisted you'd have special smear epithets for - racist, chauvinist, xenophobe. Anyone who resisted any point in your program would be demonized legally. You'd make it impossible to speak up, either by law or by immediate social ostracism via media spotlight. This is what has happened, as Trump goes to give a speech about how awesome jews are, and how we all stand in awe of them. We must uncuck our race, and that begins by observing there is...NO WAY OUT BUT THROUGH THE JEW.

Solutions
Minimalism to get your values straight. MGTOW to avoid legal traps set by (((feminism))). White Nationalism to join with others to change the system. . . . Jews are The Problem. The Problem that creates the myriad small-p problems. But as time goes by, responses arise. And they are effective, even if they are decontexted, meaning that the people who come up with them don't understand the deeper context that gave rise to the problem their solutions address. If consumerism, debt, lack of time, and split-focus are major Westen problems, then minimalism addresses these. Whether or not the minimalists grasp that jews controlling the System are behind the garbage lifestyles the media promote. Same with MGTOW - the various men making quality videos about Men Going Their Own Way do not appear to realize that feminism is part of a broader racial attack, or if they do realize that, I have not heard one say it. To repeat, feminism seems like women attacking men, but is actually jews attacking whites, just as they do with immigration policy and forcing whites to pay and fight in endless wars for Israel. Feminism is a set of rules and attitudes produced by jews and aimed at destroying the white race by making it considerably harder to form and maintain stable families. This is done, technically, by changing the law, so that the myopic, fickle woman is legally empowered to make decisions that rightly, and historically, belong to the calmer, farther-seeing man. Responsibility is severed from power, with the power going to the woman, and the responsibility remaining with the man. This means that from a purely rational standpoint, a man is nuts to enter legal marriage - or even to have anything to do with a woman. And that realization has produced a burgeoning MGTOW not movement but circle of men who realize the implications of the legal/social milieu today, even if, as I must say again, they do not understand the actual cause and motivation lying at the very bottom. Nevertheless, a large number of men have realized what is going on, in practical terms, so many that they have worked out the various implications, and posted warnings to other men not to make the mistakes they did, lest they find themselves turned into slaves by the (((courts))). White Nationalism is the political solution that alone offers an all-embracing understanding of and counterdesign to the jewish system. It understands that it is necessary to oppose Team Jew with another team: Team White. Only white nationalism has a comprehensive solution to the social misery and disintegration inflicted on all white nations by global Team Jew.

Site Review: LewRockwell.com
This was the main site I read most when mass-public Internet became a thing. I started VNN in response to it, back in the summer of 2000. The better part of 20 years later, I still read LRC, though I stopped for several years. It remains what it was: solid body of knowledge and analysis - with the spine left out. The spine is the jew-explanation that makes it all stand up and move. Foolish WN attack libertarians, from whom much can be learned, when they should be attacking conservatives, as I first advised (in Attack the Conservatives, about ten years ago. The minute they started doing as I advised - victory. Although that victory tastes of ashes now, in light of Trump's collect-'em-all 180s the last two weeks. But the strategy remains correct: polarize the public between TeamWhite and TeamJew. Destroy the fakes in the middle, the conservatives, cuckservatives, controlled or fake opposition, Washington Generals, whatever you want to call them. Notice how carefully LRC, that is Lew Rockwell, Tom Woods, and a few others, follow the alt-right, like a silent remora. They strip the jew, but they make a lot of the same points. They won't hammer Israel, but Lewpus will post without comment what the Daily Stormer's Eric Striker has been bruiting: the story that ISIS has apologized for accidentally attacking IDF soldiers. Libertarians offer solid technical analysis not just of the crooked money system run by the Fed, but of (((our))) foreign policy system as well. Ron Paul continues strong as ever, and accurate in his critique. The libertarians are right about most things, but they are essentially a political faction that personifies the truth of the old saw: courage is the virtue that brings the others to life. Without courage, you can't do anything. The libertarians lack that courage, and they more or less know it. They know what they should be saying but won't. But this doesn't make them our enemy, it makes them too weak to be real competition with racialism, and so the right way to treat them remains what it has been since 2000: study what they say, and use their valid arguments. They are not just great for technical analysis of the Fed and foreign policy, they have many good ideas for how whites can live among themselves, once the jews are vanquished. Of course they would never put it that way, since they are doctrinally individualist, but that is the deeper meaning of what they right. They offer good ideas anyone can borrow. So no need to hate them or do more than laugh at them for deciding to be little men rather than big, I always think of libertarians as interior decorators, with both the good taste and wimpiness that connotes. Just use them, use their arguments. They are not a threat to white nationlism - that's the conservatives.

WeSearchr Raising Funds for Anglin's Defense Against SPLC Barratry
Why Gersh v. Anglin is a flagrant violation of the rights of the whole Internet to criticize public figures. Tanya Gersh attempted to extort Sherry Spencer out of a building, and yet she gets to play the victim and try to silence her critics? In the complaint Tanya Gersh makes risible lies about how she was simply just trying to help Sherry Spencer after making public condemnations of her building funding racism in the press. If this is not fought, a major alt-right press outlet will die and history will record Gersh's wicked lies of just being a helpful realtor trying to faithfully assist Sherry Spencer, instead of the truth of her being a contemptible manipulator trying to steal from the mother of a man she would see silenced. Constitutional scholars unaware of the lies of Tanya Gersh are already noting the Constitutional problems with the case: The biggest problem for the Southern Poverty Law Center is that the worst comments are not made by Anglin himself, the defendant, but by third parties, Banville said. Legally, under the Communications Decency Act of 1996, anyone who publishes online isn't responsible for comments generated by others. Beyond that, the complaint doesn't even establish that authentic Stormers are even responsible for any of the threatening language Gersh took issue with. Just last month, ADL's Director Oren Segal was attempting to pin the blame on a contributor to The Daily Stormer for a series of bomb threats to Jewish Community Centers. The FBI later discovered that these bomb threats were made by an Israeli national. We all know who is really responsible for violent anti-Semitic threats all around the world. It is the same people every time. Gersh's own people forged any and all threats to her. This case will be blown open so hard when Tanya Gersh's lies are revealed in a court of law. Destroying white institutions by getting them to waste money on lawsuits is an old jewish/SPLC tactic. I hope there is some way that Anglin and Stormer can countersue this jew Gersh for extortion, because her behavior, if accurately reported, certainly fits that bill. This would require the aid of Richard Spencer's mother, and she has already made air between her and her innocent son by saying she and his father don't like his politics. Never let jews drive a wedge between you. If you don't like your relatives' politics, take that up with them privately.

Keeping It Real Estate
Keeping it real videos...for men who might think about getting involved with women or houses... Sandman's ideas. Turd Flinging Monkey says courts don't care about your prior signed agreements (with a woman) (like a prenup), they will simply discard them and subject you to ordinary gynocentric law. "You can't fix it; just walk away," he says. Howard Dare on safeguarding your health, extremely important for men. More on ESPN spiral, after 100 layoffs yesterday.  They try to deny leftist politics has anything to do with ESPN's decline. It's not the main reason, but it is certainly a contributing factor. Whiteskin leftists don't think they're leftist, they think they're normal. Just as they couldn't understand how Trump won, when all their fellowesses hated him, they can't understand why normal white people (their audience) don't like uppity coons whining for special privilege.