Linder Daily Commentary, 2017-06-19

19 June 2017

Audio:  Conclusion (ch6) of Taha. Mason, end of ch5 (p245-272) on the System.

Roundup: There was a van. But it wasn't by a river. But there was a fluid running. It was blood. For the van was near a mosque. On top of some nasty mosquitos, very likely bearing the jihadi form of zika virus. Here on nationalists accused of bombing invader center in Sweden. "Rather, there are indications that they were dissatisfied with the leadership within the Nordic Resistance Movement for not wanting to use violence to the same extent as they wanted to," said Ljungqvist. "We can also see that two of the suspects shortly before the attacks received military training in Russia." Paypal shuts down Generation Identitaire account. Introduction to Pax Dickinson's Counter-Fund. Smart people overrate how smart others are. Diversity is bad for health. Fags try to suppress Berkman (non-jew) but he will still speak at Cardinals' Christian Day. Berkman, you see, is a homophobe, and he does a really nasty thing. He runs around sticking his dick up fags' asses and giving them a lethal disease. So hateful. Must stop already. (((Rebel Media))) = anti-White. Anglin: These people are not our friends. They are here to hurt us. They are here to make sure we do not succeed in our agenda. True. As National Review, et al.,  have faded a new generation of jewed-right rises to replace them, with fresh young cucks, ready to portray jew-leftists as "Nazis" and jews as victims and free-speech defenders. Rather than the concocters of speech codes and creators of PC (jewish sharia) they actually are. The so-called alt-lite, a term I never use, is an attempt to snazzy-supersede alt-right, which is either white nationalism or nothing. Jews, feeling their endgame oats, cannot allow the game to be snatched away at the last minute by a popular, funny genuinely rebellious rampant white-right racialism. Jews ALWAYS coopt anything they're allowed into, what could be more fake than a jew as "rebel." Jews like Ezra Levant aren't rebels, they're the System. "Rebel Media" is a jewish attempt to provide whiteskin suckers with a new form but same old jew-safe, anti-White content. As it says in the Protocols, stupid goyim always value words over action. Don't be that goy, eh? ... A jew is spreading its jewseed to niggers, in what is certainly the most disturbing story you'll read all day. If you're not an atheist, then you believe there is a God who allows this type of activity to happen. Lampedusa fights back, expelling mayoress who made anti-white deal with jew Soros.

What Trump Should Do
He's being a pussy. The solution in dealing with jews, who are, of course, the ones behind this made up Russia collusion conspiracy horseshit, is always to get aggressive. More aggressive than the jews are. Instead of passive tweeting and all but playing the victim he must USE HIS POWER. I mean, christ, they're literally shooting his side, and defaming it in the press around the clock. What does he have on his side BUT power? USE IT. That will not only help him, it will encourage the others, his supporters - you know, the majority of the country. Fire people, replace them, put out executive orders. Do what needs to be done. You can't let this jew-applied bandage around your legs trip you up in your every step. Even though there is nothing to their claims, the point is these lies' FUNCTION. They are pushing you OFF your agenda and ONTO theirs. They are wasting your time. They are impeding your progress. Use every bit of power you have to attack them back - and harder. It's a lesson for all of us. Stockman says this about Trump/Mueller: Mueller’s #1 hire was the despicable Andrew Weissmann. The latter had led the fraud section of the department’s Criminal Division, served as general counsel to the F.B.I. when Mueller was its director, and, more importantly, was the driving force behind the Enron task force—the most egregious exercise in prosecutorial abuse and thuggery since the Palmer raids of 1919.

Feminism, What Is It?
Feminists are the worst. Feminism is one front in a comprehensive jewish attack on the white race meant to culminate in white genocide. It's easy to see it as an attack on men, but this puts you in the position of one of the scientists feeling their portion of the elephant. See that it is an attack on not just men, but slightly less obviously, on white families that exist, on white family formation (working against the formation and extension through time of strong white families) - and then you come out of the mountain pass onto the plateau where you can see the biggest picture - the entire race is nothing but families, and so an attack on white families and their formation is infact an attempt to destroy the entire race.

(((Rebel))) Media = Fake Opposition = Real Jews + Cucks
On the Shakespeare in the Park stunt. The whole idea of calling Hitler a leftist and judeo-leftists nazis is indeed crap. It is common to cuckservatives. Vox Day does it, though he would claim for rhetorical reasons. Showing his weak grasp of rhetoric. Clarity is needed, not confusion. The jewsmedia sows plenty of that. Today's leftists must be connected to their jew-leftist forerunners and in many cases literal bloodline ancestors. It's just another variation on Dems R Da Reel Raciss. And. Everything Bad Is Hitler/Nazism. But of course when you know that Laura Loomer is a kike, and you know that her boss Ezra Levant is a kike too, why then you have the clear motive. In their case, it's rational to identify leftists with Hitler: it protects jews. Which they both are. As I said. And you should know. How bizarrely anti-Occamic is it to call todays fucking jew leftists, who do EXACTLY what the bolsheviks in Weimar and USSR did "Nazis" - when the "Nazis" were the only ones who opposed them! And opposed them EFFECTIVELY. Ah, but there you have it: at ALL COSTS whites must be driven away from UNDERSTANDING how to oppose jews effectively, and that begins with ALWAYS DEMONIZING HITLER. And you do this by associating Hitler and his crew and their national socialism with EVERYTHING BAD. Logic doesn't matter. History doesn't matter. Honesty doesn't matter. Just associate everything "bad" (bad for jews) with Hitler, because that way lies safety. And that's why conservatives routinely perform this otherwise- and logically-incomprehensible counterfactual guilt-by-association. The right way for Whites to do it is to point out to the uncomprehending the blood and anti-white ties between today's (((left))) and yesterday's killer commies. Point out they murdered tens of millions of our kind. Do you want them to do that again? Then join THEM in calling communists Nazis. The right-wing normie in the USA has been very heavily brainwashed, but we can help many break their mental crust and see through the lies by pointing out undeniable facts.

Bullfighting, a Real White Sport
Connections to Mithras.

Comment Responses

Re Taha pp 53-64; excellent exposition of a fascinating topic; however, are her conclusions (so far) any different from the standard line of hate-German agit-prop shown every single day in MSM and school? Star Trek, Anne Frank, the Hoax, fake news ...Trite: The Germans were evil demons who wanted to take control of the world (despite no evidence to this effect). 

I can't blame her for that. 1) She doesn't make that point. 2) the book is narrowly circumscribed in topic. 3) I think it's fair to say that if you're building a spiritual-biological race of Supermen to create the Overman to create the God-man, and you simultaneously agree that Untermenschen have no rights, the world might reasonably be regarded as your stomping ground. Now of course in day-to-day affairs, including the war, the Nazis certainly did not consider taking over the world, they had no means to. Jews simply lie about that, Taha doesn't touch that stuff.

As for race superiority, pro-war American nationalist propaganda was no less cutesy. Cliche after cliche, in WW2 movies, the American GIs put aside any cultural difference (even against Brooklyn!), and use their "American ingenuity" to defeat the evil demon Germans. Seems to me a real radical would consider the defensive aspect of the German push to war: the Stalin-caused starving of the Ukraine was a threat against Germany. 

Again, that's waaaay outside her subject area. Very common tendency I observe in your words, as I used to get it all the time myself: respondents ride their own hobbyhorses, talking about things I didn't say, or inferring opinions I didn't hold. Seldom do people actually disagree with what one says, or even pay much attention to it. Taha doesn't have anything to do with WWII or military history or even propaganda. She makes one reference to an outside scholar's mention of the attitude of those NS in dock at Nuremberg, and that reference was very interesting. There could be any reason for their attitudes, including having been tortured, as most of them were, but certainly the idea of simply talking past each other, the two sides, is a provocative one. I don't know if it's true. Maybe the SS weren't really interested in explaining the truth, or the new mentality, to people who, after all, were mostly jews, and certainly not interested in the truth.